Roman...

I'm just speaking for myself here, but you stated that I think the deck has nothing wrong with it...

Let me quote Tim here as he replied to Scott.... "Have you even been reading my posts?...." lol... sorry that line just kills me, and then he proves to scott that his assumptions were wrong, by summarizing all his posts. Sorry, but I don't have time to sum them all up quote by quote, but they are running throughout the argument, and even Scott backed me up on my main points.

I've NEVER said that I think nothing is wrong with the deck. What I do think is the deck design is good and well thought out. I do however have an issue with the power of the deck. Therefore as I have repeatedly stated, my solutions to the issue are tweaking of values.

As for the theory that the combination of cards works against each other, you and scott have neither really made a reasonable case for how they work against each other. I remember reading some explanations, but it just doesn't have much basis. While on the other hand Tim and I have given you strategic and in depth anylis of how they do work together and make the deck better. Some of the comments that were made that the cards work against each other don't really have much weight... because some of the reasoning seems to be they aren't strong enough and therefore end up working against each other. In my opinion that is flawed reasoning, because you have just stated in the reason that the flaw is power...

Therefore the best way to solve the issue with the deck is to just adjust the values of cards. The design is fine...


If you want to make another Vader, then just make a new design.... this isn't the ONLY way to represent Vader. It is however Hasbro's version of Vader, and to fix it all it really needs is a power adjustment.